STUDY OF RELIGIOUS COURT JUDGES' DECISIONS ON POLYGAMY PERMITS REVIEW OF DECISION NUMBER 1749/Pdt.G/2018/Pa. Tbn AND DECISION NUMBER 2012/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sby
STUDI PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA TERHADAP IZIN POLIGAMI KAJIAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 1749/Pdt.G/2018/Pa. Tbn DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 2012/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sby
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36913/adhaper.v11i02.8Keywords:
Poligamy, judge's considerationAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in the judges' considerations in Decision Number 1749/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbn and Decision Number 2012/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sby regarding polygamy requests based on high sexual desire. This research is normative in nature, using a legislative and case-based approach. The results of the research show that the judge in Decision Number 1749/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbn rejected the petition because the alternative requirements of Article 4 paragraph (2) and the cumulative requirements of Article 5 paragraph (1) were not met. The judge interpreted extensively that the wife's obligations were not limited to serving biological needs, and the petitioner's income was deemed insufficient. Conversely, in Decision Number 2012/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sby, the petition was granted because the requirements of Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 5 paragraph (1) were deemed to have been met. The judge made a teleological interpretation and assessed that the petitioner was financially capable and had met the requirements. The majority opinion of scholars regarding court decisions that reject or grant polygamy petitions is that some scholars allow polygamy as an alternative for men who have a strong desire, provided that they are fair and provide sufficient financial support, while some scholars do not allow polygamy if it is done for the reason of having a high biological desire but without a clear purpose. This disparity in decisions is due to legislation and requirements that originate from the judge himself.
References
Agustiana Candra Vidiawati, Sholahuddin Fathurrohman. “Pemaknaan Status Penyedia Tempat Prostitusi Online (Studi Pasal 296 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana).” Mizan : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13 (2024): 269.
Ahmad Mushthafa Al-Maraghi. Tafsir Al-Maraghi. 2nd ed. Semarang: PT. Karya Toha Putra Semarang, 1993.
Amina Wadud. Qur’an and Woman. New York Oxford University Press. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Inc, 1999.
Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al - Fiqh Asy Syafi’i Al-Muyassar. Jakrta: al Mahira, 2008.
Eriska Permata Sari. “ANALISIS DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 520/Pdt.G/2010/PA.TJ Dan Putusan Nomor: 19/Pdt.G/2011/PTA.JK).” Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2019. https://repository.radenintan.ac.id/7938/1/SKRIPSI.pdf.
Ghozali, Abdul Rahman. Fiqh Munakahat. 7th ed. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2015.
H.M. Fauzan. Kaidah Penemuan Hukum Yurisprudensi Bidang Hukum Perdata. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Haikal Fadhil Anam. “Telaah Kritis Poligami Dalam Islam Perspektif Hermeneutika Feminisme Amina Wadud.” Musawa 19 (2020): 52.
Kementerian Agama RI. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Indonesia (2018).
Khoirul Abror. Poligami Dan Relevansinya Dengan Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga (Studi Di Kelurahan Rajabasa Bandar Lampung). Bandar Lampung: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M), 2016.
LDS.Law. “Extensive Interpretation,” n.d. https://www.lsd.law/define/extensive-interpretation.
M. Quraish Shihab. Tafsir Al-Misbah Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. v. Pisangan Ciputat: Penerbit lentera hati, 2012.
Mahfud, Muhammad Qudwah I’tishom Billah. “Tafsir Ayat Ahkam Surah An-Nisa Ayat 3 : Etika Poligami Dan Hikmahnya Dalam Syariat Islam.” Al-Fahmu :Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 1, no. 1 (2022): 23.
Mahmudin Bunyamin, Agus Hermanto. Hukum Perkawinan Islam. 1st ed. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2017.
Meisedelina Yustitia. “Kedudukan Hukum Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pidana Berkaitan Asas in Dubio pro Reo Berbasis Keadilan.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2023.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Pusat, Pemerintah. Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (1994).
Riyan Erwin Hidayat. “Poligami Menurut Wahbah Az-Zuhaili Dan Muhammad Syahrur.” Jurnal Tana Mana 1 (2020): 106.
Sayyid Sabiq. Fiqih Sunnah Jilid 3. Jakarta: PT. Tinta Abadi Gemilang, 2013.
Taslim Al-Buthoni. Poligami Bukti Keadilan Hukum Allah. Bekasi: Rumah Ilmu, 2016.
Yudisial, Komisi. Disparitas Putusan Hakim : “Identifikasi Dan Implikasi.” Jakarta: Sekertaris Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik indonesia, 2014.
