EVALUATION OF THE PRUDENTIAL PRINCIPALE IN CREDIT DISBURSEMEN IN SUMENEP REGENCY

EVALUASI PRINSIP PRUDENSIAL DALAM PENYALURAN KREDIT DI KABUPATEN SUMENEP

Authors

  • Febrianti Putri Ainun Nazidah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia
  • Feny Fathuri Yan Putri Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36913/adhaper.v11i01.38

Keywords:

prudential principle, non-performing loans, Banking, Sumenep Regency

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the prudential principle in banking, as mandated by Article 8 of Law Number 10 of 1998 in conjunction with Article 2 of Law Number 7 of 1992, in the context of credit disbursement in Sumenep Regency. The prudential principle serves as a key foundation for maintaining financial stability and mitigating credit risk. The research focuses on three banks operating in the region Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI) KCP Sumenep, Bank Jatim KCU Sumenep, and Bank BPRS Bhakti Sumekar and seeks to evaluate how the principle is operationalized, while identifying key barriers and institutional responses. A qualitative method is adopted, using in-depth interviews and observational techniques to gather relevant data. Findings show that each bank has consistently applied the 5C and 3R principles and utilizes the Financial Information Service System (SLIK) from OJK to assess borrower risk. Despite this, several systemic challenges persist. These include inadequate legal enforcement mechanisms against defaulting debtors, limited public financial literacy, and internal organizational pressure related to credit targets. While infrastructural support appears sufficient, the overall impact of the prudential principle on reducing non-performing loan rates remains suboptimal. The study argues for regulatory reforms that embed prudential requirements more firmly within statutory law, rather than leaving them to soft regulations. Additionally, strengthening institutional capacity and enhancing the ethical competence of banking personnel are considered vital steps to reinforce effective credit governance.

References

Chapman, Robert J. “The Controlling Influences on Effective Risk Identification and Assessment for Construction Design Management.” International Journal of Project Management 19, no. 3 (April 2001): 147–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00070-8.

Efendi, Junaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Garcia, Gillian G.H. “Ignoring the Lessons for Effective Prudential Supervision, Failed Bank Resolution and Depositor Protection.” Edited by Andrew Campbell. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 17, no. 3 (July 24, 2009): 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980910972205.

Global Financial Stability Report, April 2021. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513569673.082.

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media 8, 2020.

Kirkbride, Christopher. “Principles of Banking Law.” The Law Teacher 52, no. 4 (October 2, 2018): 528–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1496314.

LUSARDI, ANNAMARIA, and OLIVIA S. MITCHELL. “Financial Literacy around the World: An Overview.” Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 10, no. 4 (October 11, 2011): 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747211000448.

Moosa, Imad A. Operational Risk Management. New York: Springer, 2007.

MUERMANN, ALEXANDER, and ULKU OKTEM. “The Near‐Miss Management of Operational Risk.” The Journal of Risk Finance 4, no. 1 (April 1, 2002): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022951.

Ng, Tuan‐Hock, Lee‐Lee Chong, and Hishamuddin Ismail. “Is the Risk Management Committee Only a Procedural Compliance?” The Journal of Risk Finance 14, no. 1 (December 28, 2012): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/15265941311288112.

Petrella, Giovanni, and Andrea Resti. “Supervisors as Information Producers: Do Stress Tests Reduce Bank Opaqueness?” Journal of Banking & Finance 37, no. 12 (December 2013): 5406–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.005.

Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. New York: OUP Oxford, 2009.

Rojas Cama, Freddy, Noha Emara, and Mohamed Trabelsi. “Financial Inclusion and the Informal Sector.” Research in International Business and Finance 70 (June 2024): 102379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102379.

Roselli, Alessandro. “Central Bank: Independent Within the Government.” In The Political Economy of Central Banking, 175–212. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77036-4_7.

Soca Daru Indraswari. “Legal Implications of Insurance Supervisor’s Liability in Policy Failure.” Peradaban Hukum Nusantara 1, no. 2 (January 5, 2025): 122–42. https://doi.org/10.62193/gzcvc287.

Sunstein, Cass R, and Adrian Vermeule. Law and Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State. New York: Harvard University Press, 2020.

“Survei Keuangan Inklusif – Dewan Nasional Keuangan Inklusif.” Accessed January 9, 2026. https://snki.go.id/survei-keuangan-inklusif/.

Syahrum, Muhammad. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Riau: Dotplus Publisher, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check