ANALYSIS OF LAW NUMBER 56 PRP 1960 ON THE PLEDGING OF ANCESTRAL LAND IN NAGARI KOTO GADANG SOLOK REGENCY
ANALISIS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 56 PRP 1960 TERHADAP PAGANG GADAI TANAH PUSAKO KAUM DI NAGARI KOTO GADANG KABUPATEN SOLOK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36913/adhaper.v11i01.3Keywords:
Pawn, Pledge, Heirloom, ClanAbstract
Article 7 of Law No. 56 PRP of 1960 regulates the term of agricultural land mortgages, which is 7 years. After this period, the mortgage holder is obliged to return the land to its owner without paying a ransom. However, in practice, the Minangkabau indigenous community still widely practices land mortgages with varying terms and conditions. Court decisions in cases of disputes over communal land mortgages also implement different provisions. Some implement the provisions of Article 7 of Law No. 56 PRP of 1960, while others apply the provisions of Minangkabau customary law. This can be evidenced by the issuance of Supreme Court Decision Number: 1540K/Pdt/2005 dated June 19, 2006, which accommodates the provisions of Article 7 of Law No. 56/Prp/1960 concerning agricultural land mortgages without redemption money, and the Solok District Court Decision on case number: 05/Pdt.G/2003/PN.SLK dated April 20, 2004, which decided the case based on Article 7 of Law No. 56 Prp of 1960. The practice of pawnbroking that is not in accordance with Law No. 56 Prp of 1960 Article 7 has caused confusion among the people of West Sumatra. This has resulted in the people of Nagari Koto Gadang, Gunung Talang District, having different views on Law No. 56 Prp 1960 Article 7 on the Implementation of Pawnbroking. The research method used in this study is empirical juridical.
References
Aini, Ihdi. “ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN GADAI TANAH PERTANIAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 56 PRP TAHUN 1960 TENTANG PENETAPAN LUAS ( Studi Kasus Di Kenagarian Simpang Tonang, Kecamatan Dua Koto, Pasaman ) TANAH PERTANIAN.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 6, no. 1 (2020). https://jurnal.uinsyahada.ac.id/index.php/yurisprudentia/article/download/2543/1934.
Alisman. Pelaksanaan Gadai Tanah Dalam Masyarakat Hukum Adat Minangkabau Di Nagaru Campago Kabupaten Padang Pariaman Setelah Berlakunya Pasal 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 56/Prp/1960. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2005.
Aprillya, Annetha Sandra, Kartika Dewi Irianto, and Mahlil Adriaman. “PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH ADAT DENGAN GADAI DI NAGARI KOTO TUO KECAMATAN AMPEK KOTO Annetha.” Rio Law Jurnal 4, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v4i2.1121.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2012.
Aziz, Farhan Muhammad, Zulfikar Jayakusuma, and Ulfia Hasanah. “PELAKSANAAN PAGANG GADAI SAWAH BERDASARKAN HUKUM ADAT DI KANAGARIAN KOTO TINGGI KECAMATAN BASO KABUPATEN AGAM PROVINSI SUMATERA BARAT.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (October 2020): 1–15.
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (April 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.
Darmawan, Budi, and Endah Regita Cahyani Nazra. “Koto Gadang in Local History: A Nagari That Forming 20th Century Indonesian Intellectuals.” Criksetra: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah 13, no. 1 (June 2024). https://doi.org/10.36706/jc.v13i1.14.
Gozali, Djoni Sumardi, and Noor Ha Dah. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kebendaan Hak Kebendaan Memberi Kenikmatan & Jaminan. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2022.
“Hasil Wawancara Dengan Bapak Edisar Mantibasa Selaku Ketua Adat Nagari (KAN) Koto Gadang Kabupaten Solok Tanggal 26 Desember 2021,” n.d.
“Hasil Wawancara Dengan Bapak Edison Mantibasa Selaku Ketua Adat Nagari, Pada Tanggal 21 Desember 2021,” n.d.
“Hasil Wawancara Dengan Bapak Zanidan, Tanggal 05 Januari 2022.” n.d.
Ibnu Syechkant. “Pelaksaan Praktik Pagang Gadai Tanah Ulayat Di Nagari Parik Panjang Kabupaten Agam Sumatera Barat.” Pemuliaan Keadilan 2, no. 2 (April 2025): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v2i2.584.
Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “PEMAHAMAN TERHADAP ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MELALUI KONSTRUKSI PENALARAN POSITIVISME HUKUM.” CREPIDO 1, no. 1 (July 2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.
Kadir, Abdul. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Lesta, Arelita cheisya, Kurniawarman Kurniawarman, and Yasniwati Yasniwati. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Tanah Pada Perjanjian Pagang Gadai Masyarakat Hukum Adat Minangkabau Di Nagari Koto Laweh Kabupaten Tanah Datar.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (June 2024): 9916–34. https://doi.org/10.31933/UNESREV.V6I4.1958.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1540K/Pdt/2005 (2005).
———. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Solok atas perkara nomor 05/Pdt.G/2003/PN.SLK (2003).
Monita, Della, and Iyah Faniyah. “Pelaksanaan Dan Berakhirnya Gadai Tanah Harta Pusako Tinggi Masyarakat Adat Minangkabau.” Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review 1, no. 1 (2022). https://journal.unespadang.ac.id/JSELR/article/download/277/259/1548.
Putra, Aulia Ade. “ANALISIS DIKABULKANNYA PERMOHONAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI SETELAH PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN SENGKETA GADAI TANAH ULAYAT.” Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 4, no. 2 (2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332102457_ANALISIS_DIKABULKANNYA_PERMOHONAN_PENINJAUAN_KEMBALI_SETELAH_PELAKSANAAN_PUTUSAN_SENGKETA_GADAI_TANAH_ULAYAT.
Rahmadhani, Vina, Jazilah Astiti, and Venska Salsabila Labaika. “Analisis Yuridis Penggunaan Sertipikat Tanah Sebagai Objek Gadai Pada PT Pegadaian.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 12304–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2194.
Senda, Vika Nur, Susi Sopiani2, Mochamad Fajar Muzzamil, and Dikha Anugrah. “IMPLIKASI HUKUM KETIDAKTERPENUHAN SYARAT SUBJEKTIF DALAM PASAL 1320 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA TERHADAP KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN.” LETTERLIJK: JURNAL HUKUM PERDATA 1, no. 2 (2024).
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Soleman B. Taneko. Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1986.
Umar, Muhammad, Sutiarnoto, and Jelly Leviza. “Analisis Yuridis Hapusnya Hutang Gadai Tanah Berdasarkan PERPPU Nomor 56 Tahun 1960 Tentang Gadai Tanah Pertanian (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 255 K/Pdt/2018).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Hikmah 3, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30743/jhah.v3i1.5045.
Wafiq, Muhammad, Yurniwati, and Vima Tista Putriana. “Implementasi Pagang Gadai Dalam Perspektif Akuntansi Syariah (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Solok Selatan).” Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (MSEJ) 4, no. 5 (2023): 5577–87. https://doi.org/10.37385/MSEJ.V4I5.2980.
“Wawancara Dengan Bapak Mantibasar Selaku Ketua Adat Nagari (KAN) Nagari Koto Gadang Kabupaten Solok.” Solok, n.d.
Yunita, Afdela. “EKSEKUSI GADAI TERHADAP OBJEK JAMINAN YANG BUKAN MILIK SIPEMBERI GADAI PADA PT. PEGADAIAN.” Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2019).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Febri Yuranda Surya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
