ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S DECISION ON THE JOINDER OF CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT AND UNLAWFUL ACTS (Study of Decision Number: 4268 K/Pdt/2022)
ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN WANPRESTASI DAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (Studi Putusan Nomor: 4268 K/Pdt/2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36913/adhaper.v11i02.14Keywords:
merger of lawsuits, Defaults, Unlawaful ActsAbstract
This paper analyzes the practice of combining breach of contract and tort lawsuits in Indonesia, with a focus on the Supreme Court Decision No. 4268 K/Pdt/2022. Initially, the case was qualified as a breach of contract by the District Court (Decision No. 48/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Bdg) and the High Court (Decision No. 115/Pdt/2021/PT.Bdg), but later requalified as a tort by the Supreme Court. This study aims to examine the practice of combining breach of contract and tort in Indonesian civil procedure and to analyze the judge’s considerations in changing the legal qualification. This research uses a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches. Data were collected through literature study of primary legal materials. The analysis used is prescriptive analysis. The results show that in practice, the combination of breach of contract and tort claims is not permissible if they are not closely related, as it may lead to an unclear lawsuit. However, if both are closely connected, systematically separated, and clearly explained, such combination is allowed. In Decision No. 4268 K/Pdt/2022, the claim was considered valid because both legal bases were related to the same object and events, and were presented separately.
References
Asikin, Zainal. Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2015.
Burgerlijk Wetboek. “KUHP: Kitab UU Hukum Perdata,” 2007.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif. Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Fauzi, Rony. “Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Ppat Oleh Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang.” Jurnal Hukum Internasional, 2019, 8–59.
Haryati, Wulandari Balqis, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah, and Sumatera Utara. “ANALISIS PENERAPAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PERBUATAN INGKAR JANJI DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 147/PDT.G/2022/PN.MDN,” 2023.
Hukum, Fakultas, Universitas Padjadjaran, Hanna Firdausa Pratonggopati, Universitas Padjadjaran, Rai Mantili, Universitas Padjadjaran, Efa Laela Fakhriah, and Universitas Padjadjaran. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penggabungan Dasar Gugatan Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum” 7 (2023): 100–113.
Isnandar, Aries, Vanka Lyandova, Yogi Prasetyo, Ferry Irawan Febriansyah, Alfalachu Indiantoro, and Ucuk Agiyanto. “Cumulated Lawsuit And Tort: Legal Reasoning of Judges and Major Decision’s Ratio Decidendi (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985).” Jurnal Jurisprudence 12, no. 2 (2023): 204–16. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1332.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2022 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan.” Surat Edaran Nomor 1 Ta, no. tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2022 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan (2022): 1–16.
Mahkamah Agung RI. “Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung RI,” no. September (1963): 5–7.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Ama Pustaka, 2017.
Munir, Fuady. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum:Pendekatan Kontemporer. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
Munir, Mishbahul, and Jusmadi Ridho. Praktek Peradilan Perdata. Edited by Lucky Dafira. Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2020.
Nurhayani, Neng Yeni. Hukum Perdata. Edited by Beni Ahmad Saebani. Pertama. CV. Pustaka Setia, 2015.
Putusan, Direktori, Mahkamah Agung, and Republik Indonesia. “Putusan No. 886 K/Pdt/2007,” 2007.
Putusan, Direktori, Mahkamah Agung, Republik Indonesia, Kecamatan Pondok Gede, Kota Bekasi, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, and Jakarta Selatan. “Putusan Nomor 4268 K/Pdt/2022,” 2022.
Putusan, Direktori, Mahkamah Agung, Republik Indonesia, Tn Kiki Gunarso, and Karyawan Swasta. “Putusan Nomor 115/Pdt/2021/PT.Bdg,” 2021.
Putusan, Direktori, Mahkamah Agung, Republik Indonesia, A Panjaitan, S H Mh, Riduan Manurung, S H Mh, et al. “Putusan Nomor 48 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PN.Bdg.,” 2020.
Siregar, Maralutan, Tan Kamello, Hasim Purba, and Rosnidar Sembiring. “Pemisahan Gugatan Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Materiil Dan Penerapan Di Pengadilan” 2, no. 6 (2023): 532–48.
Suryana, Dicky Aditya, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Bhayangkara. Wanprestasi Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Skripsi, 2022.
Yahya Harahap S.H, M.Harahap. Hukum Acara Perdata. Edited by H Tarmizi. Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
